Category Archives: Blog

It’s a bureaucrat-eat-bureaucrat world….

The wheels of French bureaucratic justice are grinding slowly by surely, and this time, it is a regulatory agency that is on the receiving end of the guillotine…

Kafka Weber

I previously reported on the very unusual story that broke out a year ago about the French pharmaceutical regulator being potentially the subject of criminal investigation for allowing the continuing sales of the anorectic drug Mediator despite the publication of data suggesting it could be harmful.

The case is currently on the desk of judges and it appears that ANSM (formerly AFFSAPS) may be facing charges of manslaughter!

I commented that the scientific data with which the agency is getting indicted is incredibly meager, but the criminal aspect of the conduct may not be so much that AFFSAPS allowed a harmful drug to be sold on the market, but that it allowed it on the market longer than the other EC countries.

With bureaucratic principles and legal doctrine becoming more similar among Western nations subjecting themselves to the oversight of supranational organizations, I suspect US trial lawyers will be watching this development with great interest.

Is the government writing your next hypertension guidelines?

The release of the latest report from the Joint National Committee on Hypertension (JNC-8) has been delayed for several years.  It’s already been a decade since the prior report was issued.

Until recently the reason for the delay was obscure, but in the March issue of Cardiology News inside information is provided by cardiologist Sidney Smith.  The UNC professor of medicine, who has made a career out of writing practice guidelines for the American Heart Association, is a senior writer on the JNC-8 panel and this is what he had to say:

The delay has been due in large part to an unprecedented degree of prerelease review by numerous government agencies at a multitude of levels. This extensive and time-consuming advance scrutiny was instituted mainly because many health officials felt blindsided by the publication of the U.S. Preventive Health Services Task Force controversial mammography guidelines, which kicked up a hornet’s nest of criticism in the breast cancer and public health communities. Government officials don’t ever want to be caught by surprise like that again, explained Dr. Smith, professor of medicine at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

That’s right.  There is nothing more frustrating for a government official than to be caught by surprise by a body of medical experts sifting through scientific data for the benefit of practitioners.  The report must first be approved by the authorities!

We suppose that when the government pays for so much of health care and medical research, it’s only natural it would try to ensure that scientists have the national interest in mind, No?

James O’Keefe on exercise: prescient or premature?

Thanks to John Mandrola for reporting on the buzz being created by Dr. James O’Keefe from the Mid-America Heart Institute.  Besides the recent WSJ article that cites a yet to be published paper by O’Keefe, this recently posted 18-minute TED-x talk by Dr. O’Keefe informs us of the gist of his claims:



Here’s the play-by-play: Continue reading

Kanu Chatterjee as Chairman of the Fed

He was among the first to understand the benefits of afterload reduction:

Next, he understood early on that inotropic therapy provides (at best) only short-term benefit, at the risk of killing the patient:

Parenteral sympathomimetic agents, usually dobutamine, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors, usually milrinone, are used for the management of exacerbations of chronic systolic heart failure. Although hemodynamics, and occasionally clinical status, improve, such therapy is associated with increased mortality and can potentially hasten a patient’s demise.

As we undergo another round of monetary stimulus, experience unprecedented deficits, and contemplate de jure or de facto tax increases,  any reason why treatment for economic failure shouldn’t be modeled after treatment for heart failure?

Federal Reserve Chairman Kanu Chatterjee

Box 4 of the ACP’s ethics manual and my 2¢ on parsimony

There’s been a bit of a buzz following the release of the latest edition of the ACP’s Ethics Manual.  For the first time, it seems, the manual includes a section on “stewardship of resources” with directives summarized in Box 4.

The Left hailed the new change as “truly remarkable” and an important first step to “break the logjam” of health care deficits, while the Right was quick to denounce the set of instructions as an “ethical game-changer,” a surreptitious undermining of the doctor-patient relationship, or an overt step toward health care rationing. Continue reading

“Regulator, Prends garde à toi!” (and let’s add fuel to the OCP fire while we’re at it)

A interesting story is unfolding in France.

In the wake of a recent breast implant scandal, French drug regulator AFSSAPS is now the target of a criminal investigation for keeping on the market the anorectic benfluorex (Mediator) which allegedly caused the premature deaths of hundreds if not thousands of French citizens from valvulopathies.  Some AFSSAPS executives have even had their homes searched.  The head of the agency resigned.

The story was reported by Reuters and by the  The investigation is taking place after a couple of papers were published claiming that over the course of the last 33 years, Mediator has been responsible for over 1300 deaths from valve disease.   The most recent one is available from Wiley free online, at least for now.

There are several puzzling aspects to this story: Continue reading

The purges have begun: has cardiology entered the Reign of Terror?

The has the following news report about a Maryland doctor accused of overstenting:

Baltimore, MD – A malpractice lawyer is accusing Dr John Chung-Yee Wang (Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD), a member of the committee tasked with stopping improper stenting in Maryland, of improper stenting in his own practice [1].

The Baltimore Sun reports that medical malpractice attorney Jay Miller has filed complaints with the state health claims arbitration office against Wang. Miller alleges that Wang, Dr Mark Midei, and Dr Kourosh Mastali wrongfully stented patient John Bowers in 2005 and 2006, when the three interventionalists were partners in MidAtlantic Cardiovascular Associates, a practice that has since disbanded. Miller also charges that Wang overstated the extent of coronary disease in patient Lorie Skillman to justify implanting a stent (…)

As reported by heartwire, the Maryland Medical Board revoked Midei’s medical license after it determined he repeatedly violated the Medical Practice Act by implanting hundreds of unneeded stents while working at St Joseph Medical Center in Towson, MD. Midei is one of several high-profile cases of alleged overstenting in recent years.

Wang is part of the Technical Advisory Group on Oversight of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Services, a group of experts tasked by the Maryland Health Care Commission (MHCC) to develop recommendations for legislative changes that would improve oversight of coronary intervention labs in the state. The committee is set to report its findings at a public meeting of the health commission today. “The allegations could cast a shadow over the work of the advisory committee,” the Sun reports. Wang was nominated for the committee by the Maryland chapter of the American College of Cardiology (ACC).

We may recall another period of time when committees played a prominent role in regulating safety and security. Continue reading